Aldous Crane: Difference between revisions
Add Caitlyn companion, visible book selection and reader tags |
Expand spoiler-conscious reader companion and add reading guides |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Role in the story == | == Role in the story == | ||
His experience of earlier crop failure informs the way he talks about emergency action. His | His experience of earlier crop failure informs the way he talks about emergency action. His contributions to council discussions sit alongside the concerns of growers and other representatives. | ||
== In the book == | == In the book == | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
[[Category:Characters]][[Category:The Two-Body Problem]] | [[Category:Characters]][[Category:The Two-Body Problem]] | ||
== Council context == | |||
Crane belongs to a room where agricultural decisions must be explained beyond the growing team. Experience, family standing and formal responsibility can each give a speaker influence. They need not give that speaker the same view as the people tending the rows. | |||
This entry identifies his position in that conversation. Readers can compare his arguments with those of the other [[The Two-Body Problem supporting characters|council representatives]] without having their motives settled for them. | |||
Latest revision as of 12:00, 14 October 2026
Aldous Crane is an influential figure in the council, associated with the old Mars families.
Role in the story
[edit | edit source]His experience of earlier crop failure informs the way he talks about emergency action. His contributions to council discussions sit alongside the concerns of growers and other representatives.
In the book
[edit | edit source]Introduced in Chapter 12.
Explore further
[edit | edit source]Council context
[edit | edit source]Crane belongs to a room where agricultural decisions must be explained beyond the growing team. Experience, family standing and formal responsibility can each give a speaker influence. They need not give that speaker the same view as the people tending the rows.
This entry identifies his position in that conversation. Readers can compare his arguments with those of the other council representatives without having their motives settled for them.